Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 29.06.2025 00:11

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Thank you.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Unde non omnis quia ut et magni ea.

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Why do people think Mirko is boring in My Hero Academia?

Let’s just make it real clear:

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Dakota Johnson Realized This Outfit Mistake Mid-Interview — And Her Reaction Was Priceless - HuffPost

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

What’s next?

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Why is there a housing crisis in Europe?

Russia can stop this any time.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Panthers' winning formula goes missing in Stanley Cup Final Game 1 loss to Oilers - NHL.com

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Why do so many people suddenly think it's acceptable to continue to live with their parents into adulthood?

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Solar Storms Are Pushing Elon Musk’s Satellites Back to Earth - Gizmodo

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Just in the last 5 years:

‘Resident Evil Requiem’ Sets February 2026 Release From Capcom - Variety

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

What are some reasons why people may fear strong men?